film.1chill,
ha! prvi! :)
film.2chill,
Umro Akiro Kurosava...
film.3chill,
-> #2, chill...ne, nije harikiri! :)
film.4petarg,
Lista klišea u filmovima.
html format
JG
cliche.zipfilm.5dr.grba,
Ovo je stiglo u grupu 'Tolkien'...
Snimaće se igrani film 'The Lord of the Rings', u tri dela...
From: JASON W VESTER <vester@nevada.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <merp@tower.ml.org>
Subject: The Movie is Finally Official!!! (fwd)
Date: 25 August 1998 06:59
Friends, MERPers, Countrymen, lend me your ears. For I come not to bury
the ancient rumor of a LOTR trilogy but to praise it...
Cheers,
Jason
--------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 19:12:04 -0400
From: TimElf@aol.com
Reply-To: metw@tower.ml.org
To: Multiple recipients of list <metw@tower.ml.org>
Subject: The Movie is Finally Official!!!
Here's the press release. I am EXCITED! The LA Times also reported that
John Howe and Alan Lee have been working with Jackson on the "look" of
the movie. Everyone go look at Howe and Lee's artwork on your cards and
try to tell me this movie won't look good!!
New Line Cinema to Produce Trilogy of Films Based
on J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Lord of the Rings' for Director Peter Jackson
- Saul Zaentz to Exec. Produce Project Picked up From Miramax Films --
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 24 /PRNewswire/ -- New Line Cinema will commit more
than $130 million to produce a live action, special effects-packed
trilogy of films based on J.R.R. Tolkien's internationally renowned
fantasy novel ``The Lord of the Rings,'' it was announced today by
Robert Shaye, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of New Line Cinema,
Michael Lynne, President and Chief Operating Officer of New Line Cinema,
Michael De Luca, President and Chief Operating Officer of New Line
Productions, and Mark Ordesky, President of Fine Line Features. Peter
Jackson will co-write, co-produce and direct the franchise, which will
be executive produced by Academy Award-winning film legend Saul Zaentz.
Jackson's longtime production partner Fran Walsh will co-write and
co-produce the films through the director's WingNut Films banner.
New Line picked-up the rights to ``Lord of the Rings'' and Tolkien's
other seminal classic ``The Hobbit'' from Miramax Films. Miramax
co-chairmen Bob and Harvey Weinstein will serve as executive producers
of the potential franchise. New Line's deal also includes worldwide
merchandising rights to consumer products based on the film property.
The company may release the trilogy as a Christmas-summer-Christmas
event series during the 2000-2001 calendar year. The films will be
produced consecutively and all will be shot on location in New Zealand.
Principal photography will last approximately one year, and it is
expected that production will begin by mid-1999. Weta Digital, Jackson's
innovative special effects firm based in New Zealand, will be
responsible for the elaborate computer generated visuals demanded of the
epic project.
``This deal represents a unique collaboration between competitors in the
independent film world, and an unprecedented production commitment on
behalf of New Line Cinema,'' Shaye said. ``Anyone who is familiar with
Tolkien's work knows that this is one of the most internationally
beloved pieces of fiction ever produced. We are completely committed to
Peter Jackson's vision for this trilogy, and we will make sure that he
has the necessary logistical, financial and creative support to complete
a project of this size and scope.''
Jackson has been developing the trilogy for more than two years while
working with his groundbreaking visual effects team to perfect
proprietary computer programs that will be used during the complex
production and post-production process.
``It has taken 45 years for filmmaking technology to finally catch up
with Tolkien's imagination,'' Jackson said. ``We are fortunate down here
in New Zealand to have both the computer technology and the natural
landscapes to bring the unique world of Middle Earth to life. It's very
exciting to be making 'The Lord of the Rings' as a trilogy. Shooting
three feature films back-to-back has never been done before, and it
shows tremendous vision on the part of Bob Shaye and New Line Cinema.
Not only will we create a unique cinematic event, but we will be
treating Tolkien's work with the respect and integrity it deserves.''
Added Harvey Weinstein, co-chairman of Miramax Films, ``Given our long-
term relationship with Peter Jackson dating back to his Academy
Award-nominated 'Heavenly Creatures,' and our respect for Bob Shaye,
Michael Lynne and their excellent team at New Line, we're pleased that
Peter's vision for 'Lord of the Rings' will be realized.''
Demonstrating the enormous popularity of Tolkien's work, ``Lord of the
Rings'' has sold more than 50 million copies worldwide while being
translated into 25 different languages. ``The numbers support our
enthusiasm for the project,'' Shaye said, adding ``we believe
international interest, licensing and promotional opportunities will be
extraordinary.''
Fine Line Features President Mark Ordesky was instrumental in securing
the project, and he will oversee the project on behalf of the studio
along with New Line Productions President Michael De Luca.
``Peter's creative foresight, technological prowess, and passion for the
project uniquely qualify him to translate one of the world's most
imaginative novels to the screen,'' De Luca and Ordesky said.
New Line's Senior Executive Vice President Ben Zinkin and Senior Vice
President of Business Affairs Suzanne Rosencrans negotiated the
agreements, along with Ordesky. ICM's Ken Kamins represented Jackson and
Walsh. Jackson was also represented by attorneys Peter Nelson and George
Davis of Nelson, Guggenheim, Felker & Levine. Al Bendich represented
Zaentz.
Last year, ``Lord of the Rings'' was named the ``#1 Book of the
Century'' in a survey of more than 25,000 avid readers in the United
Kingdom. Published in 1954-55, Tolkien's timeless masterpiece ``The Lord
of the Rings'' -- comprised of ``The Fellowship of the Ring,'' ``Two
Towers,'' and ``The Return of the King'' -- stands as one of the
greatest works of imaginative fiction ever written.
Set in a mythic pre-history, ``The Lord of the Rings'' tells the saga of
a desperate battle against encroaching evil -- a perilous quest to save
humanity which falls upon the shoulders of a young hobbit, Frodo
Baggins, who has inherited a seemingly innocent magic ring from his
elderly cousin Bilbo.
However Frodo soon learns that the ring's original maker, the Dark Lord
Sauron, is desperately seeking it -- for it is a ring of great evil
which will enable Sauron to enslave the people of this land known as
Middle Earth. A hurriedly assembled fellowship of wizard, elf, dwarf and
men accompany Frodo and his friends on a harrowing mission across Middle
Earth in an attempt to destroy the ring by casting it into the volcanic
fires in the Crack of Doom. Against them rages the monstrous power of
Sauron, whose sinister emissaries ruthlessly pursue Frodo and his
companions, while the omnipotent power of the ring attempts to corrupt
the fellowship from within.
An internationally respected filmmaker, Peter Jackson received an
Academy Award(R) nomination for his screenplay of ``Heavenly
Creatures,'' a film he also directed and produced. ``Heavenly
Creatures'' was awarded a Silver Lion at the Venice Film Festival in
1994.
Among his other films, he previously directed and co-wrote ``Dead
Alive,'' which won 16 international science fiction awards, including
the Saturn. Most recently, he was responsible for ``The Frighteners,''
which was executive produced by Robert Zemeckis.
Walsh co-wrote the Academy Award-nominated ``Heavenly Creatures'' and
has also collaborated with Jackson on ``Meet the Feebles'' and ``Dead
Alive.''
A legendary producer, Zaentz secured the rights to ``The Hobbit'' and
``The Lord of the Rings'' directly from author J.R.R. Tolkien. Among his
many credits, he has produced such Academy Award- winning films as ``The
English Patient,'' ``Amadeus,'' ``One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest,'' and
he is a recipient of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences'
prestigious Irving G. Thalberg Memorial Award. Zaentz is also co-owner
of Fantasy Records, the first recording company to introduce audiences
to Dave Brubeck, Lenny Bruce and Creedence Clearwater Revival. Fantasy
has grown into one of the largest jazz labels in the world.
Along with his work on ``The Hobbit'' and ``The Lord of the Rings,''
Tolkien is the famed writer of such fantasy genre novels as ``The
Adventures of Tom Bombadil,'' and ``The Silmarillon.'' A distinguished
professor of English, Tolkien began writing ``Lord of the Rings'' in
1936, and the three volumes took more than 14 years to complete.
Founded in 1967, New Line Cinema is the entertainment industry's leading
independent producer and distributor of theatrical motion pictures. New
Line licenses its films to ancillary markets including cable and
broadcast television as well as to international venues. The company,
which is a subsidiary of Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX - news), operates
several divisions including in-house theatrical distribution, marketing,
home video, television, acquisitions, production, licensing and
merchandising units.
SOURCE: New Line Cinema
---------
To unsubscribe, send 'signoff METW' as the body of a message
to listproc@tower.ml.org. For help, send the word 'help'.
---------
To unsubscribe, send 'signoff MERP' as the body of a message
to listproc@tower.ml.org. For help, send the word 'help'.
film.7sherloc,
E nisam znao gde da bacim ovo, ali mislim da ce se i ove lepo
smestiti :)
Jel ima neko bilo kakve slike, wavove, ili bilo sta uopste vezano
za The X-Files ?
Hvala Unapred
ByE
film.8johnnya,
-> #7, sherloc >> Jel ima neko bilo kakve slike, wavove, ili bilo sta uopste vezano
>> za The X-Files ?
Uvodna tema, MID format.
x_files.zipfilm.9sherloc,
-> #8, johnnya>> Uvodna tema, MID format.
Hvala. Ima li jos neko nesto.
ByE
PS. Zna li neko adresu na internetu vezanu za x-files? Ako to
uopste postoji.
film.10dselic,
-> #9, sherloc> PS. Zna li neko adresu na internetu vezanu za x-files? Ako to
> uopste postoji.
Jesi li probao Altavistu/Yahoo? Siguran sam da će ti bilo koji od ova
dva izbaciti par hiljada siteova na tu temu.
dan
film.11dr.grba,
Sleduju dve duuuge poruke. Ali, baš me zanima da li ćete mi zameriti <:
Peter Jackson Answers THE GEEKS!!! 20 Questions About Lord Of The Rings!!!
Well this will spur discussion for the next 3 months. Here's the
answers to the questions you all sent in. Many of the questions are
blendings of several questions into long-winded multi-part questions.
Why'd I do this? Well, I received over 14,000 questions. You may have
noticed Father Geek doing a lot of updating recently... well this was
to facilitate me editing, blending and trying to get in front of Peter
the most questions within a 20 question format. When I sent it to him,
a response came back almost immediately with... "Jesus... give me a
day or two." I really have enjoyed this little experiment of Peter's,
and I'm sure that most of you out there would agree we should do it
again. Also, with the 2 to 3 month intervals... well that allows Peter
the time to get the scripts written, more work at the art department
level, a production manager to begin mapping out the process, the
hiring of crew members, talks with actors, etc etc.. So next time
we'll learn even more. Thanks to Peter for sitting still for this,
though it was his suggestion, now Peter enough questions go make our
kick ass movies!!!
Before I get started, I'd like to thank all the folk who sent
questions in. If the 20 that Harry has picked are representative, then
you have thought hard about the difficulties of adapting this book. A
lot of the concerns you raise focus on the same areas that we are
currently grappling with.
I also must thank Harry for allowing me to commandeer his site. It's a
bit like a scene in a war movie when a French family gets booted out
of their farm house because the Allied Forces need to set up a command
post! Using Harry's site was the only way I could imagine reaching all
of you in an efficient way. I very much appreciate his co-operation
and hard work in compiling 20 questions from the 14,000 he received.
After this brief warm shower together, Harry and I return to our
different sides of the line - us trying to maintain secrecy ... and he
using his low-life methods to publish it all on the net.
I hope this Q&A addresses some of your immediate questions and
concerns, but please don't send Harry any more questions. I have to go
to ground and do some writing. If you want to do this again, and Harry
agrees to it, then it will be in 2 or 3 months time and I am sure
you'll get plenty of warning.
Here we go ...
1. It seems that a ton of readers are concerned about the physical
portrayal of the main characters within the 'Fellowship'. Specifically
the following: The use or lack of use of 'small people' to accomplish
Hobbits, and the decision to use CGI to shrink folks. Then there is
the 'pointy eared' elf thing. Not to mention whatever Gandalf is, how
you plan to deliver dwarves. Basically the question is how do you plan
on delivering the different types that make up the 'company'? And why
you decided to go in that direction, and is it 'faithful' to the look
that's been established by the cartoons, illustrators, etc?
As everyone has read, we have made a decision to portray hobbits by
reducing "normal" sized actors. This decision was made for several
reasons:
1/ It seems to be what Tolkien had in his mind, from the way he
described hobbits.
2/ It gives us the greatest pool of actors to choose from.
3/ The hobbits are our chief heroes, who we must totally connect with
over the course of 3 movies. That ruled out the use of CGI hobbits as
I felt any artificial method of creating a character would be an
impediment to our bonding with them. They would be a gimmick, rather
than a real character.
Dwarfs like Gimli will either be a real little person, or a normal
height actor reduced like the hobbits. A decision has yet to be made.
Elves will be actors, but with a certain "Elven" look.
Hobbits, Dwarfs and Elves will probably all have subtle prosthetics,
but these tests have not yet been done. I know that battle rages over
pointy ears. We have yet to decide on the final looks for all these
different races.
I do want to make them "real" ... not too fantasy-like or cartoony.
They must be believable. My favourite illustration of a hobbit is in
the edition of THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING with Alan Lee's
illustrations. Look at the picture of Frodo and Gandalf sitting in Bag
End. That's not just a good guide for how I imagine a hobbit - it's
also a good reference for the tone or atmosphere I'm aiming for in the
films.
2. Another major question that fans have had, has to do with the
decision to make "THE LORD OF THE RINGS" prior to "THE HOBBIT".
Describe what made you decide to go with the trilogy first, what made
you step over 'THE HOBBIT' and do you think that after your filmic
journeys into Middle Earth with this trilogy, do you think you will
want to visit Bilbo and his adventures from the first book?
United Artists have owned the US distribution rights to THE HOBBIT for
many years (but not the right to actually make it). I know that
Miramax approached UA a couple of years ago about doing some kind of
partnership, but was not successful. That made up Miramax's mind to do
THE LORD OF THE RINGS first.
I am happy to be doing the trilogy first, since it is much more
complex and interesting than THE HOBBIT. THE HOBBIT has a very simple
story with very little character development. It would actually be
harder to adapt into a satisfying movie than THE LORD OF THE RINGS
(and that has not been easy!).
New Line Cinema have the right to make THE HOBBIT (UA still owns the
distribution rights), and have every intention of doing it following
the trilogy. I don't know if I would be involved. It depends on my
mental condition in 3 years!
3. There seems to be quite a bit of doubt about 'only' having $130
million to make the trilogy. How do you plan to stretch that money
out, while still giving these films the rich world that Tolkien
envisioned? I.E... Cite examples of enhancing New Zealand locales with
CGI, How much practical effects work vs CGI, and what will you try to
do practical and what will you try to do CGI?
This is a very understandable concern. Let me explain:
Dollar for dollar, New Zealand is a cheaper place to make movies than
the US. A camera that costs US$3000 per week to rent in the States may
only cost NZ$2000 here. Add to that, the exchange rate savings ($US1 =
$NZ2) and that camera in New Zealand only costs $US1000 to rent - a
third of the price. Following me?
It basically means that the $US130m will buy 3 movies that have the
screen value of closer to $350m. It is only this economy that has made
THE LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy affordable. Believe me, nobody in
Hollywood would commit $350m to make 3 movies back-to-back. It would
never happen. These books have been "unfilmable" for 45 years, and
would continue to be unfilmable.
But please don't be concerned about the "quality" of these movies. It
is enough money to make 3 mind-blowing films! There will be money on
screen to compare to anything that has ever been made.
4. This one comes from Julian of Sydney... Though he plays a massive
underlying role in the books (he is the Lord of the Rings after
all...), the character of Sauron's appearance (the Dark Lord) is never
described in any detail (except for his catlike, yellow eyes [windows
into nothingness] and his burning hot, black skin - black as in not
african american black, but jet black). Also there is no direct
dialogue with Sauron in the book, only flashbacks to historical events
ie. his interrogation of Gollum, his fight with Isildur when the One
Ring is taken along with his mind-communication through the Isenguard
Palantir orb. So, my question is - how will Peter depict Sauron
visually in the movie, and what will his voice sound like? I think
part of the reason why Sauron was so intriguing and impressive as a
character in the books, was very much because his presence was always
felt, rather than personified as one being - the reader was left
pretty much to imagine what he may have looked like. I can see that
Peter will probably have to portray him in the movies, but I just hope
he doesn't make him into a stereotypical cinematic villain. After all
Sauron's power and historical descent from goodness to hellish evil,
makes Satan look like a cute little puppy dog... And remember one of
the biggest and most powerful cinematic scenes will inevitably be the
party's confrontation with the Balrog in Moria - but the Balrog was a
mere servant of Morgoth and then Sauron.
This is a great question, and one that we have been grappling with for
18 months. We still don't have a definitive answer. The Sauron of the
books is sketchy at best, which makes it hard to turn him into a
screen villain to carry 3 movies. Imagine not really seeing Darth
Vader for all 3 Star Wars films. You just can't do it.
We obviously have Sauron's various emissaries to represent him, but
just how Sauron himself appears is still a puzzle we are trying to
solve. I agree that you can't reduce him to being a big guy striding
around in black armour - but he cannot be limited to a flaming eye
either. It's tough. We'll keep working on it.
5. Lots of people wrote in with this one, so I'll summarize it on up.
You mentioned in your statement that you want to make movies that you
think Professor Tolkien would be proud of. What about the Tolkien
estate? How closely are you working with Christopher Tolkien and what
is your relationship with him going to be during this project? If you
have talked with him about the project, what has he thought thus far?
We are dealing with the "estate", rather than Christopher personally.
They have made their position very clear: While they are in no way
opposed to a film(s) being made, they do not want to be involved.
The reason is basically simple: if they had any involvement, then the
films would become "official" - in other words, they would be seen as
being endorsed by the estate. This is a situation that the estate does
not want, as they consider themselves to be protectors of Tolkien's
written word, not film makers. I don't think the estate will be
reading scripts or commenting on the movies. We keep them informed on
progress, which they appreciate, but they want their involvement to be
very arms length.
I said something here in NZ in an interview, which is worth repeating:
You shouldn't think of these movies as being "THE LORD OF THE RINGS".
THE LORD OF THE RINGS is, and always will be, a wonderful book - one
of the greatest ever written. Any films will only ever be an
INTERPRETATION of the book. In this case my interpretation. The
Tolkien estate has no reason to want to get involved in somebody
else's interpretation of the Professor's work.
6. Here's one of the chief fears from fans, and lots of them are
curious about what you think. Fantasy film has been with us straight
from the beginning. It has been mined by Korda, Fairbanks,
Harryhausen, Pal, etc. At that time their films were quite successful.
But in the last twenty years the fantasy film has nose-dived into
granite. What is wrong with the modern fantasy film, what is missing,
and how is this going to be any different from the parade of fantasy
duds that have been kicking sand in the face of fantasy lovers for a
generation now?
One of my chief reasons for wanting to spend nearly 5 years of my life
making these films has been that I don't think that fantasy has been
well served by cinema. So I agree with your comments. I can't get into
a deep debate about the last 20 years of fantasy, but I have been
disappointed by the films as well. Either the style has been wrong, or
often the scripts have been terrible. Starting out with strong scripts
(and we are obviously dealing with great material) will put us ahead
of a lot of other fantasy films. Not making the movies
self-consciously fantasy will help too.
7. This comes in from Chyren, and is echoed by a good 40 others.
"Given that the books in LOTR are long and deeply indebted to
Tolkien's technique of creating 'Literary Depth' by having a complex
backstory, how can this be even slightly presented in a film version?
In other words, LOTR was the end-tale of a huge three-millennium
history of Middle-Earth. How can you allude to this on screen without
just creating another Sword & Sorcery style crappy Willow film that is
just plain confusing?
A good comment, and one that we feel strongly about too. As we have
written drafts of THE LORD OF THE RINGS, we have layered in more and
more depth with each subsequent draft. Some of it is important to the
story (Isildur, Elendil, etc) and some is not. However, it creates the
feeling of a real world. No movie can ever go into the depth than
Tolkien did obviously, but we are going to use prologues, flashbacks
and narration to paint a picture of Middle-earth that will hopefully
be more than superficial.
Not being confusing is vital. That has been a fault of many fantasy
films. We have to make movies that both readers and non-readers can
enjoy and understand (I know the concept of having to cater to
non-readers is frustrating, but it is important. Don't worry - we
won't allow it to "dumb-down" the material). There are ways of doing
that, and I am confident we will get there, without compromising the
integrity of the work too much. It's a huge help to have 3 films to
work with.
"AND..the books themselves are not structured to easily equate to a
screenplay. Most of the first book is a gentle stretch of journey and
masses of exposition (which occurs mainly when the Hobbits reach
Elrond's House). There not much full-on action or even interesting
stuff until the end of the second and third books. How much junk are
you going to have to cut out? How much of the books will ACTUALLY
reach the screen?"
It is true that most of the cuts will come out of the first book. We
have to reach Rivendell a little quicker than the book does, as that
is the point that the story picks up. I don't agree that there's not
much interesting stuff in THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING, but it does lack
a urgency. That is one of the biggest problems with adapting the books
- Tolkien gave his characters a fairly leisurely journey - I don't
mean the length of the journey, but rather the lack of dramatic
tension, especially pre-Rivendell. For the movies, we will have to
make motivations a little tighter and more urgent. We have to focus on
The Ring, Sauron and the threat to Middle-earth. There is not much
room for other stuff that is not directly connected to this narrative
spine.
"Chyren comments: I realize that movie making is totally different
from the art of a book, and that books can't be translated onto the
screen totally. That's me, I know these things. You do realize, don't
you, that whatever you do, some percentage of rabid Tolkien fans are
always gonna attack you for 'butchering' their bible?
I'm in no doubt about that. Remember ... it's just my interpretation.
God, I wouldn't be in your shoes for quids, mate! Still, as long as
it's better than that Ralph Bakshi debacle, I personally don't mind
what you do!"
Making it better than the Bakshi version would be good.
8. Probably the most asked question, even though you asked not to ask
about it, is about Casting. So this question won't be "Who is Gandalf"
"Who is Aragorn?" Instead I'm going to try to weasel some info out of
you that will stir the debate pot a bit. What is your casting
philosophy going to be with this series of films. For example, while I
was on THE FACULTY set, Elijah Wood often talked to me about this
project. He cited over and over about how much he loved the books, and
how he'd love to be anything in it. This is most likely a feeling that
a lot of talent in Hollywood will have. Will you, if talent lowers
it's wages, cast big name actors in smaller parts? (ie Sam Jackson in
Star Wars Episode One) Or do you plan on avoiding the Where's Waldo
style of casting?
The basic philosophy is to cast unknowns as the hobbits and use better
known actors for the smaller roles, i.e. Elrond, Theoden, Denethor,
etc. I would be happy casting unknowns for all roles, as fresh faces
will bring a sense of reality to the films, however I'm sure New Line
will want some names. We won't be able to afford huge stars. Sean
Connery won't be Gandalf (one of the most enduring pieces of net
mythology). We couldn't afford him, he wouldn't live in NZ for a year,
and I don't think he's right for the role. I love Connery, but I want
Gandalf to be fresher than that. I like the Patrick McGoohan idea
somebody mentioned ... that type of thinking is the right way to go.
We have a couple of other strong ideas for Gandalf (I won't say who,
but I've never seen their names on the net). We will no doubt audition
a 100 actors to find the ideal Gandalf.
The idea of "stars" stepping forward and declaring themselves Tolkien
fans is interesting ... let's see what happens.
Depending on the answer, is this because of a sound you want to the
dialogue? And speaking of dialogue will it be in Tolkien's tongue?
We have written the scripts in a reasonable "Tolkien" style ... on
occasions using his dialogue verbatim. The older characters, i.e.
Gandalf, Theoden, Denethor are pure Tolkien in their dialogue style.
The younger hobbit characters slightly less so, but still not hip or
modern. Sam will be pure Sam, and Gollum will be pure Gollum in style.
We will use other languages, particularly Elvish, on occasion, with
English sub-titles.
(sledi nastavak...)
conf join CIVILIZACIJA.11
conf reply film
(...nastavak)
9. Another major vein of curiosity has been the scale of these films.
Using terms that will light our imagination and paint a picture for
us, how big will these films be? This involves the scale of battles,
vistas, creatures.
They will be very epic in scale - but one of the great things about
THE LORD OF THE RINGS is the fact that they are very grounded in
character and relationship. So imagine a tight personal, very
emotional story set against sweeping vistas, huge cities and vast
armies.
The battles will be the biggest you have ever seen (I promise).
We have two wonderful artists working for us on conceptual designs ...
Alan Lee and John Howe. Both have done many Tolkien paintings before,
and I loved their interpretation of the characters and places. We are
creating original designs, not copying their earlier art, but a look
at the previous work of Alan and John's will give you a strong sense
of the visual style I am aiming for.
It also deals with the texture of the film, the aspect ratio and the
score. What are your thoughts on how you'll bring this to screen?
We will shoot in Super 35, giving us a 2.35 ratio. We have flirted
with the idea of 70mm, but the problems with CG effects at that
resolution are too daunting.
The score will be classical sounding. I'd like a create a Celtic feel
without being Celtic if you get what I mean ... something non-cliched.
No composers have been considered yet. There are no plans to use any
of the existing Tolkien-inspired music.
10. Jason out of Australia had this question for ya: "Will any of the
poetry/songs in Tolkien's work be kept in the films?" And to follow up
on it, if you do keep them how will you portray them?
There will be a little of it, but not much. A little on screen, a
little on the soundtrack. It's a difficult thing to work into a
dramatic telling of the story.
11. Given the massive following these books have, and the fact that
this is the number one most inquired question, and the fact you've
stated that you'll need 15,000 extras for certain scenes, I've chosen
Mike of Finland to ask the question. "Where and when will the casting
take place?
It will start in October in LA, London, Australia and New Zealand.
What should I do to appear in the film?
You would need to audition and be the very best person for that
particular role, out of the 100 - 200 actors that we will test for
each character.
Do I need an agent to be considered for a speaking role? Do you hire
only professionals for the major parts or do qualified amateurs have a
chance as well?
There are no rules, but you would have to connect your nearest casting
director and convince them you were good enough.
What requirements do you have for the extras?" Of course I have to
admit that just about everyone I know wants to be an orc, it's akin to
being a stormtrooper. The surest way to increase tourism to New
Zealand is to announce a desire for extras, and there will be fans
booking flights instantly.
We will find our extras in the New Year. They will be cast in New
Zealand and will have to be precise physical types depending on if
it's for Orcs, Elves, Men, etc. It is possible that we may approach
the army for most of our extras.
12. This question comes from Ryan of New Zealand: "A lot of things are
not described explicitly in the books, but hinted at or told second
hand, and I'd like to know how you will go about showing us show us
those things.
Some of the "second hand" stories will be told on-screen in a more
straightforward chronology. Others will be left as narration. You will
definitely be seeing a lot of things dramatised on film that Tolkien
related as expositionary dialogue.
Please tell me whether the Balrog will be a solid creature or a
shadowy one, and whether it will be winged,
We are still working on the Balrog designs. He will be a real
creature, but we will try very hard to capture the feel that Tolkien
describes in this sequence. Our designs have wings at the moment, but
that can be changed if it is not correct.
whether Legolas - who is never really described - will have blond hair
and pointy ears like all those Dungeons and Dragons freaks out there
picture him,
Don't know yet. It will start with casting an actor and working from
there on his final look.
and whether we will get to see - perhaps in a flashback - the combat
of Gandalf and the Balrog after they fall from the bridge in Moria,
I don't think so.
and likewise if there will be visual flashbacks
of the ent's storming of Isengard,
Yes, that will be seen.
and of the history of Middle-earth as related in various parts of the
story by Gandalf, Elrond, and Aragorn?
Most of the Middle-earth history we show will be related to events
important to our immediate story, i.e. Isildur's death, defeat of
Sauron during the Second Age and the history of Gollum and the Ring.
We will be detailing some of the Elven history as well as a sense of
the Numenorians and the rise, and decline, of Gondor. That will mostly
be in narration and not on-screen.
13. This comes from Sir Etch-a-Sketch: "Describe the tone that you
will be using to tell this story. You've stated that you don't see it
as a Fantasy Film, but as telling a true story. What do you mean by
that, and cite examples."
It might be clearer if I described it as an historical film. Something
very different to Dark Crystal or Labyrinth. Imagine something like
BRAVEHEART, but with a little of the visual magic of LEGEND. (LEGEND
had a lackluster script in my view. It looked great, but the visual
style was too unreal, overwhelming and not suitable for this story).
It should have the historical authority of BRAVEHEART, rather than the
meaningless fantasy mumbo-jumbo of WILLOW.
14. Jacob of W. Virginia asked this one, which is echoed by about 20
others. "What types departures will you be taking with the telling of
the story and how did they come about?"
This is the 64 thousand dollar question I guess!
I'm not going to answer this in huge detail, as we are still working
on the scripts. We have about 300 pages written as 2 long movies. We
now have to convert them into 3 scripts of maybe 110 pages each - so
we do have a little more room to explore new ideas.
Our philosophy is simple. We don't want to make any radical changes to
the basic events or characters in the books. So Sam will NOT become a
girl (another piece of rumour-mill bullshit that's been floating
around for a year), or have a gay relationship with Frodo, or anything
silly like that.
We will have to remove certain events or characters, but they will be
clean lifts. As somebody pointed out earlier, THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE
RING will need the greatest pruning.
Any changes that we do make will be centered on developing characters
or events in the spirit that Tolkien created them, but maybe taking
them further than he did. For example, the Aragorn/Arwen romance is a
lovely part of the story ... but if it was filmed exactly as Tolkien
wrote it, they would have maybe 10 minutes screentime together over 6
hours of film. So we have to find a way to include Arwen in more of
the story, to have a chance at creating a meaningful screen romance.
However, we won't do anything radical like adding her to the
Fellowship, as that would be departing too much from what we all know
and love. It's a fine line that we walk.
15. To gore or not to gore. There are gigantic battles in this film,
how will you film these and what is the threshold of gore for the
films?
These films will be PG13, but I would like them to be a hard PG13. The
battles can't be BRAVEHEART violent, but we could maybe think about a
slightly "harder" version for laserdisc release.
16. In getting New Line to sign on the dotted line, it has been said
that their faith came from the script and the reel of tests that you
and WETA showed them. What was on this reel, and what work has Weta
and the 50 some odd people that have been laboring away come up with?
When we talked to studios about getting involved, we screened a 36
minute video documentary we made very quickly before we left. This
documentary style video had interviews with key crew and design people
and lots of footage of design paintings, models, armour and CG tests.
Cool stuff included on the tape: An Uruk-Hai in full armour and
prosthetics, and Orc make-up test, models of Helm's Deep and
Rivendell, marquettes of Elven armour and weapons, Gollum marquettes,
a Cave Troll and a Balrog concept. CG tests included a CG Troll and a
couple of huge Helm's Deep battle shots using a piece of WETA software
called MASSIVE that has been developed over the last 2 years expressly
to achieve huge battle scenes for THE LORD OF THE RINGS. MASSIVE
allows us to have 200,000 CG extras that we don't animate, but they
use a complex form of Artificial Intelligence to fight each other. You
basically press a button, sit back and watch these huge battles unfold
before your eyes. It's amazing and a little frightening as it ushers
in a new era in CG effects.
Bob Shaye watched the tape in total silence and then declared that he
wanted to make 3 movies. Bob deserves the credit for making a trilogy
... it was his idea.
The 36 min tape would be a great addition on a laserdisc box set.
17. What made you go, "Peter Jackson needs to make THE LORD OF THE
RINGS"? What are you most excited about this project?
It gives me a chance to break new ground in the movies. Every film
genre has been done well over the last 100 years, but not this type of
fantasy story. If we get it right, it will be the first time. No film
maker could ask for a greater challenge than that.
18. How open will this project be? Meaning what types of things will
you be showing us fans in the years leading up to this film.
It will be like the SW Trilogy I suppose. Expect the same level of
secrecy/revelations. I will try and kept a steady stream of
information flowing. I know how frustrating it is.
How quickly do we get to see designs, models, sketches, stills,
trailers, toys, a rough cut, etc...
I don't know the answers to that ... a trailer? That seems a million
years away to me right now. New Line will control all of this and our
relationship with them is only just beginning.
19. Richard of New York asks: "Will the films be titled "Fellowship of
the Rings" "Two Towers" and "Return of the King" or will you go with
LOTR1, LOTR 2, LOTR 3? What do you theorize the running time to be?"
I assume that we will use the book titles, probably with THE LORD OF
THE RINGS kinda of a wrap around title, like STAR WARS.
For those who are interested, when we were making 2 movies with
Miramax, we were thinking of calling them THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING
and THE WAR OF THE RING.
I imagine the films will have an approx 6 hour running time.
20. What gets you shaking like a kid on Christmas Morning on this
project? In otherwords, when you look at the films, what are you dying
to capture on film, and how will you do it?
These types of intangible questions are the toughest. I guess I'm
lucky to have only one!
I want to take movie-goers into Middle-earth, in a way that is
believable and powerful.
Imagine this: 7000 years has gone by. We take a filmcrew to Helm's
Deep ... it's now looking a little older, but still impresses as a
mighty fortress. The Art Dept set to work, patching up holes and
removing tourist signs. The current owner strikes a hard bargain, but
New Line money finally gets us permission to film there for 6 weeks.
Rohan heraldry is studied and faithfully reproduced. Theoden's
original saddle is in a museum - far too valuable to use in the movie,
but an exact copy is made. Archeological expeditions have unearthed an
incredibly preserved mummified Uruk-hai carcass. We make exact
prothestic copies of these viscous killers ... use CG to give us a
10,000 strong army. We have cast actors who look like Aragorn and
Theoden. In an amazing casting coup, Legolas has agreed to return from
Valinor with Gimli to recreate their part in this cinematic retelling
of the events at the end of the Third Age. They stand on the
battlements of the Deeping Wall, wind blowing in their hair, leading a
group of extras proudly portraying the brave garrison of Rohan
soldiers ... Uruk drums roll up the valley ... huge lighting rigs
flash simulated lightening ... rain towers send gallons of water into
the air ... on an assistant director's signal, twenty 35mm cameras
start rolling simultaneously ... the battle of Helm's Deep is about to
be captured on film.
Sure, it's not really THE LORD OF THE RINGS ... but it could still be
a pretty damn cool movie.
Cheers, Peter J
film.12dr.grba,
(...nastavak)
9. Another major vein of curiosity has been the scale of these films.
Using terms that will light our imagination and paint a picture for
us, how big will these films be? This involves the scale of battles,
vistas, creatures.
They will be very epic in scale - but one of the great things about
THE LORD OF THE RINGS is the fact that they are very grounded in
character and relationship. So imagine a tight personal, very
emotional story set against sweeping vistas, huge cities and vast
armies.
The battles will be the biggest you have ever seen (I promise).
We have two wonderful artists working for us on conceptual designs ...
Alan Lee and John Howe. Both have done many Tolkien paintings before,
and I loved their interpretation of the characters and places. We are
creating original designs, not copying their earlier art, but a look
at the previous work of Alan and John's will give you a strong sense
of the visual style I am aiming for.
It also deals with the texture of the film, the aspect ratio and the
score. What are your thoughts on how you'll bring this to screen?
We will shoot in Super 35, giving us a 2.35 ratio. We have flirted
with the idea of 70mm, but the problems with CG effects at that
resolution are too daunting.
The score will be classical sounding. I'd like a create a Celtic feel
without being Celtic if you get what I mean ... something non-cliched.
No composers have been considered yet. There are no plans to use any
of the existing Tolkien-inspired music.
10. Jason out of Australia had this question for ya: "Will any of the
poetry/songs in Tolkien's work be kept in the films?" And to follow up
on it, if you do keep them how will you portray them?
There will be a little of it, but not much. A little on screen, a
little on the soundtrack. It's a difficult thing to work into a
dramatic telling of the story.
11. Given the massive following these books have, and the fact that
this is the number one most inquired question, and the fact you've
stated that you'll need 15,000 extras for certain scenes, I've chosen
Mike of Finland to ask the question. "Where and when will the casting
take place?
It will start in October in LA, London, Australia and New Zealand.
What should I do to appear in the film?
You would need to audition and be the very best person for that
particular role, out of the 100 - 200 actors that we will test for
each character.
Do I need an agent to be considered for a speaking role? Do you hire
only professionals for the major parts or do qualified amateurs have a
chance as well?
There are no rules, but you would have to connect your nearest casting
director and convince them you were good enough.
What requirements do you have for the extras?" Of course I have to
admit that just about everyone I know wants to be an orc, it's akin to
being a stormtrooper. The surest way to increase tourism to New
Zealand is to announce a desire for extras, and there will be fans
booking flights instantly.
We will find our extras in the New Year. They will be cast in New
Zealand and will have to be precise physical types depending on if
it's for Orcs, Elves, Men, etc. It is possible that we may approach
the army for most of our extras.
12. This question comes from Ryan of New Zealand: "A lot of things are
not described explicitly in the books, but hinted at or told second
hand, and I'd like to know how you will go about showing us show us
those things.
Some of the "second hand" stories will be told on-screen in a more
straightforward chronology. Others will be left as narration. You will
definitely be seeing a lot of things dramatised on film that Tolkien
related as expositionary dialogue.
Please tell me whether the Balrog will be a solid creature or a
shadowy one, and whether it will be winged,
We are still working on the Balrog designs. He will be a real
creature, but we will try very hard to capture the feel that Tolkien
describes in this sequence. Our designs have wings at the moment, but
that can be changed if it is not correct.
whether Legolas - who is never really described - will have blond hair
and pointy ears like all those Dungeons and Dragons freaks out there
picture him,
Don't know yet. It will start with casting an actor and working from
there on his final look.
and whether we will get to see - perhaps in a flashback - the combat
of Gandalf and the Balrog after they fall from the bridge in Moria,
I don't think so.
and likewise if there will be visual flashbacks
of the ent's storming of Isengard,
Yes, that will be seen.
and of the history of Middle-earth as related in various parts of the
story by Gandalf, Elrond, and Aragorn?
Most of the Middle-earth history we show will be related to events
important to our immediate story, i.e. Isildur's death, defeat of
Sauron during the Second Age and the history of Gollum and the Ring.
We will be detailing some of the Elven history as well as a sense of
the Numenorians and the rise, and decline, of Gondor. That will mostly
be in narration and not on-screen.
13. This comes from Sir Etch-a-Sketch: "Describe the tone that you
will be using to tell this story. You've stated that you don't see it
as a Fantasy Film, but as telling a true story. What do you mean by
that, and cite examples."
It might be clearer if I described it as an historical film. Something
very different to Dark Crystal or Labyrinth. Imagine something like
BRAVEHEART, but with a little of the visual magic of LEGEND. (LEGEND
had a lackluster script in my view. It looked great, but the visual
style was too unreal, overwhelming and not suitable for this story).
It should have the historical authority of BRAVEHEART, rather than the
meaningless fantasy mumbo-jumbo of WILLOW.
14. Jacob of W. Virginia asked this one, which is echoed by about 20
others. "What types departures will you be taking with the telling of
the story and how did they come about?"
This is the 64 thousand dollar question I guess!
I'm not going to answer this in huge detail, as we are still working
on the scripts. We have about 300 pages written as 2 long movies. We
now have to convert them into 3 scripts of maybe 110 pages each - so
we do have a little more room to explore new ideas.
Our philosophy is simple. We don't want to make any radical changes to
the basic events or characters in the books. So Sam will NOT become a
girl (another piece of rumour-mill bullshit that's been floating
around for a year), or have a gay relationship with Frodo, or anything
silly like that.
We will have to remove certain events or characters, but they will be
clean lifts. As somebody pointed out earlier, THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE
RING will need the greatest pruning.
Any changes that we do make will be centered on developing characters
or events in the spirit that Tolkien created them, but maybe taking
them further than he did. For example, the Aragorn/Arwen romance is a
lovely part of the story ... but if it was filmed exactly as Tolkien
wrote it, they would have maybe 10 minutes screentime together over 6
hours of film. So we have to find a way to include Arwen in more of
the story, to have a chance at creating a meaningful screen romance.
However, we won't do anything radical like adding her to the
Fellowship, as that would be departing too much from what we all know
and love. It's a fine line that we walk.
15. To gore or not to gore. There are gigantic battles in this film,
how will you film these and what is the threshold of gore for the
films?
These films will be PG13, but I would like them to be a hard PG13. The
battles can't be BRAVEHEART violent, but we could maybe think about a
slightly "harder" version for laserdisc release.
16. In getting New Line to sign on the dotted line, it has been said
that their faith came from the script and the reel of tests that you
and WETA showed them. What was on this reel, and what work has Weta
and the 50 some odd people that have been laboring away come up with?
When we talked to studios about getting involved, we screened a 36
minute video documentary we made very quickly before we left. This
documentary style video had interviews with key crew and design people
and lots of footage of design paintings, models, armour and CG tests.
Cool stuff included on the tape: An Uruk-Hai in full armour and
prosthetics, and Orc make-up test, models of Helm's Deep and
Rivendell, marquettes of Elven armour and weapons, Gollum marquettes,
a Cave Troll and a Balrog concept. CG tests included a CG Troll and a
couple of huge Helm's Deep battle shots using a piece of WETA software
called MASSIVE that has been developed over the last 2 years expressly
to achieve huge battle scenes for THE LORD OF THE RINGS. MASSIVE
allows us to have 200,000 CG extras that we don't animate, but they
use a complex form of Artificial Intelligence to fight each other. You
basically press a button, sit back and watch these huge battles unfold
before your eyes. It's amazing and a little frightening as it ushers
in a new era in CG effects.
Bob Shaye watched the tape in total silence and then declared that he
wanted to make 3 movies. Bob deserves the credit for making a trilogy
... it was his idea.
The 36 min tape would be a great addition on a laserdisc box set.
17. What made you go, "Peter Jackson needs to make THE LORD OF THE
RINGS"? What are you most excited about this project?
It gives me a chance to break new ground in the movies. Every film
genre has been done well over the last 100 years, but not this type of
fantasy story. If we get it right, it will be the first time. No film
maker could ask for a greater challenge than that.
18. How open will this project be? Meaning what types of things will
you be showing us fans in the years leading up to this film.
It will be like the SW Trilogy I suppose. Expect the same level of
secrecy/revelations. I will try and kept a steady stream of
information flowing. I know how frustrating it is.
How quickly do we get to see designs, models, sketches, stills,
trailers, toys, a rough cut, etc...
I don't know the answers to that ... a trailer? That seems a million
years away to me right now. New Line will control all of this and our
relationship with them is only just beginning.
19. Richard of New York asks: "Will the films be titled "Fellowship of
the Rings" "Two Towers" and "Return of the King" or will you go with
LOTR1, LOTR 2, LOTR 3? What do you theorize the running time to be?"
I assume that we will use the book titles, probably with THE LORD OF
THE RINGS kinda of a wrap around title, like STAR WARS.
For those who are interested, when we were making 2 movies with
Miramax, we were thinking of calling them THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING
and THE WAR OF THE RING.
I imagine the films will have an approx 6 hour running time.
20. What gets you shaking like a kid on Christmas Morning on this
project? In otherwords, when you look at the films, what are you dying
to capture on film, and how will you do it?
These types of intangible questions are the toughest. I guess I'm
lucky to have only one!
I want to take movie-goers into Middle-earth, in a way that is
believable and powerful.
Imagine this: 7000 years has gone by. We take a filmcrew to Helm's
Deep ... it's now looking a little older, but still impresses as a
mighty fortress. The Art Dept set to work, patching up holes and
removing tourist signs. The current owner strikes a hard bargain, but
New Line money finally gets us permission to film there for 6 weeks.
Rohan heraldry is studied and faithfully reproduced. Theoden's
original saddle is in a museum - far too valuable to use in the movie,
but an exact copy is made. Archeological expeditions have unearthed an
incredibly preserved mummified Uruk-hai carcass. We make exact
prothestic copies of these viscous killers ... use CG to give us a
10,000 strong army. We have cast actors who look like Aragorn and
Theoden. In an amazing casting coup, Legolas has agreed to return from
Valinor with Gimli to recreate their part in this cinematic retelling
of the events at the end of the Third Age. They stand on the
battlements of the Deeping Wall, wind blowing in their hair, leading a
group of extras proudly portraying the brave garrison of Rohan
soldiers ... Uruk drums roll up the valley ... huge lighting rigs
flash simulated lightening ... rain towers send gallons of water into
the air ... on an assistant director's signal, twenty 35mm cameras
start rolling simultaneously ... the battle of Helm's Deep is about to
be captured on film.
Sure, it's not really THE LORD OF THE RINGS ... but it could still be
a pretty damn cool movie.
Cheers, Peter J
film.13sherloc,
-> #10, dselic
>> Jesi li probao Altavistu/Yahoo? Siguran sam da ce ti bilo koji od
>> ova dva izbaciti par hiljada siteova na tu temu.
Pa problem je bas u tome sto bi mi izbacio koju hiljadu site-ova,
vecina od njih je bezveze, ili mozda je bolje reci, ne moze se naci
nista posebno. Mislio sam ako neko zna neku adresu, provereno
dobru, da ne moram da pretrazujem tih par hiljada :)
ByE
film.14ztasic,
-> #5, dr.grba╗ Ovo je stiglo u grupu 'Tolkien'...
╗
╗ Snimaće se igrani film 'The Lord of the Rings', u tri dela...
Prvo sam se u*ro od sreće. Potom pomislih "Amerikanci" - pa sam
postao sumnjičav. A kada videh da se pominju specijalni kompjuterski
efekti i ostale trice - uhvatila me panika...
Malo potražih na Mreži, i izgleda da nisam usamljen.
___________________________________________________________________
Tolkien's works bound for Hollywood
The hobbits are about to embark on their most dangerous journey.
The paunchy little creatures, who survived terrifying adventures in
Middle Earth, are bound for film stardom in Hollywood.
Saul Zaentz, the owner of the screen rights to The Hobbit and The
Lord of the Rings ş and producer of the Oscar-winning The English
Patient ş has disclosed plans to capture J R R Tolkien's flights of
fantasy on screen with the latest digital special effects and a cast of
top Hollywood actors.
Wholesale revisions may be required to condense the complex
tales, which began life in the late 1920s as the doodlings of an
Oxford University philologist bored with marking examination
scripts, and became an American campus cult in the 1960s and
1970s.
Despite the prospect of generous royalties from the film and the
merchandising that will accompany it, Tolkien's family are unhappy
with the venture, which they believe will tarnish the magic of the
epic tales. Priscilla Tolkien, the author's only daughter, said: "I am
against a film being made."
John Tolkien, his eldest son, feared commercial pressures would
inevitably detract from the books. "It may be a very good film. But
the stories were created for one medium and would inevitably have
to be distorted to fit another," he said.
Their fears are supported by one expert who warned that the
stories would require the addition of a love interest to appeal to
cinema audiences. Frodo, the nephew of Bilbo Baggins, may have
to give up his loyal servant, Sam Gamgee, because viewers might
wrongly suspect homosexual overtones in their relationship.
Brian Sibley, who adapted The Lord of the Rings for BBC radio,
warned that some of Tolkien's social assumptions were dated.
"Frodo might have to be given a female companion instead," he
said.
Tolkien, who died in 1973, resisted the commercialisation of his
work during his lifetime. Humphrey Carpenter, his biographer, said
the author constructed forbiddingly complex maps and linguistic
guides to Middle Earth because he regarded his books not as
imaginative fantasies, but as real histories, of which he was the
chronicler.
In one letter, written in 1937, he urged his publishers to keep his
work out of the clutches of Walt Disney.
"Let the Americans do what seems good to them by means of
illustrating The Hobbit in America," he wrote, "as long as it is
possible to veto anything from, or influenced by, the Disney studios,
for all whose work I have a heartfelt loathing."
Christopher, Tolkien's youngest son, said a film could make his
father's worst fears about the disruptive effects of publicity come
true. A cult of obsessive fans pestered his father in old age, forcing
him at one stage to move to a secret address.
Christopher, who is his father's literary executor, said Tolkien
addicts had also forced him into hiding. He now lives in a former
farmhouse in a forest in the south of France. "In 1975 we literally
had to flee," he said. "It got absolutely insupportable to continue
living in Britain."
Zaentz predicted that the Tolkien films will become box-office hits,
but insisted he would not allow the myth to be tarnished.
"We have rejected countless proposals on the way," he said. "We
will only approve work which is sensitive to the detail. The films
could be as much of a landmark as The Wizard of Oz."
Three big Hollywood studios are vying for the movie rights ş
Universal, the makers of Jurassic Park and its sequel, The Lost
World; Dreamworks SKG, the studio part-owned by Steven
Spielberg, and Miramax, a division of Disney. The directors John
Boorman and Peter Jackson have declared their interest.
A previous attempt to bring Tolkien's creation to the screen ended
unhappily. In 1978 Zaentz produced an animated version of the first
half of The Lord of the Rings, which was released to mixed
reviews. It earned about ú15m at the American box office, and
plans for a sequel were abandoned.
The publishers of The Lord of the Rings, which has sold a total of
50m copies, and The Hobbit, which sold 35m, are anxious to
protect Tolkien's stories. David Brawn, a senior manager at
HarperCollins, said: "A bad piece of casting could cause severe
damage."
The hobbits' fans are also likely to prove themselves formidable
guardians of Tolkien's creation. Sibley, whose radio adaptation
starred Ian Holm as Frodo, Sir Michael Hordern as Gandalf and
John Le Mesurier as Bilbo Baggins, warned Zaentz not to tamper
with the books. "People not only have a clear idea of what they
should look like; they even know what they should sound like," he
said.
Wayne Hammond, author of several books on Tolkien, agreed:
"Danny DeVito might be suitable as a hobbit, with Sean Connery as
one of the elder kings. But everybody who has read the books has
conflicting images in their minds."
Contributor: Nicholas Hellen
___________________________________________________________________
Pa, g-din Zaentz ima dva puta pred sobom - ili će ući u legendu, ili ide
ravno do dna, uz kletve miliona Tolkinovih fanova.
Anyway, nisam znao da je dotični svojevremeno radio na onoj bedi
od crtane verzije.
Da ne gnjavim previše, time will tell, ali ipak... brrrr...
film.15johnnya,
ARMAGDENON
Taman pomislim, ma ne mogu Ameri da naprave gluplji/naduvaniji/nerealniji
film, ali to im nekako polazi za rukom iz godine u godinu.
Gledati ako imate između 5 i 12 godina.
film.16juice,
-> #15, johnnya:> Taman pomislim, ma ne mogu Ameri da naprave
:> gluplji/naduvaniji/nerealniji film, ali to im nekako polazi za rukom iz
:> godine u godinu.
:> Gledati ako imate izmedu 5 i 12 godina.
Pa posto igra Lyv onda moramo i mi od 20+ :))))
Pozdrav!
film.17dragosh,
-> #9, sherloc-> PS. Zna li neko adresu na internetu vezanu za x-files? Ako to
-> uopste postoji.
Zvanični sajt ti je www.x-files.com a za ostale probaj preko search-a..
film.18miskop,
-> #7, sherloc>> Jel ima neko bilo kakve slike, wavove, ili bilo sta uopste vezano
>> za The X-Files ?
Ha, kao da si znao... ;) Baš sam pre neko veče skinuo sa
Interneta "Episode Guide" svih epizoda "X-Files"-a i sad
malo dorađujem i šaljem večeras. Super izgleda, ima i sli-
čica za svaku epizodu. BTW, .HTML format.
Znam, znam, nestrpljivi ste, ali sačekajte do večeras. ;)
P.S. Uz poruku je jedna fino urađena fotka Moldera i Skali,
onako, da 'prezalogajite' nešto pre večerašnjeg DL-a. ;)
xfiles.jpgfilm.19miskop,
-> #9, sherloc>> PS. Zna li neko adresu na internetu vezanu za x-files? Ako to
>> uopste postoji.
http://www.thex-files.com/
Surova adresa. Sve i svašta, i što je najvažnije, svetski
urađena. I kao što sam rekao u prethodnoj poruci, skinuo
sam ceo "Episode Guide" i šaljem večeras.
film.20dalex,
-> #12, dr.grba> Our philosophy is simple. We don't want to make any radical changes to
> the basic events or characters in the books. So Sam will NOT become a
> girl (another piece of rumour-mill bullshit that's been floating
> around for a year), or have a gay relationship with Frodo, or anything
> silly like that.
:))))
film.21dalex,
-> #11, dr.grba> 5. Lots of people wrote in with this one, so I'll summarize it on up.
> You mentioned in your statement that you want to make movies that you
> think Professor Tolkien would be proud of. What about the Tolkien
> estate? How closely are you working with Christopher Tolkien and what
> is your relationship with him going to be during this project? If you
> have talked with him about the project, what has he thought thus far?
> We are dealing with the "estate", rather than Christopher personally.
> They have made their position very clear: While they are in no way
> opposed to a film(s) being made, they do not want to be involved.
Ne znam baš tačno šta ovo znači? Da li je moguće da film ipak
ne bude napravljen (tako se valjda odustalo svojevremeno od snimanja
'Neuromansera' zbog Gibsonovog protivljenja)?
film.22miskop,
The X-Files - Episode Guide
------------------------------
- Nekih 120-tak epizoda, u 5 sezona prikazivanja - 1993 - '98.
- HTML format
- ZIP arhiva - raspakujte sa opcijom za podfoldere
- Pokrenuti X-FILES.HTM
- Uživati! ;)
P.S. U opisanom sadržaju svake epizode, na mestima gde se spominju
Molder i Skali su linkovi ka njihovim biografijama. Pošto bi bilo
mukotrpno da svaku od 120 epizoda editujem (da bi linkovi radili ;),
imate posebne foldere ( [mulder], [scully] i [sister] ) u kojima
su biografije pomenutih.
P.P.S. DL _o_b_a_v_e_z_a_n_ ! ;)
xfiles.zipfilm.23sherloc,
-> #22, miskop>> ** Uz poruku 'XFILES.ZIP' (1197228 bytes)
U jebote, jadan sam ja sa mojih 4800(izem ti sezam) :(((
Ali skinucu ovo, pa makar crko :)
ByE
film.24morkin,
-> #7, sherloc> Jel ima neko bilo kakve slike, wavove, ili bilo sta uopste vezano
> za The X-Files ?
2/2
x_files2.midfilm.25morkin,
-> #7, sherloc> Jel ima neko bilo kakve slike, wavove, ili bilo sta uopste vezano
> za The X-Files ?
1/2
x_files.midfilm.26bsto,
Uz poruku ide WAV iz X-files-a.
xfilewav.arjfilm.27vdjole,
-> #5, dr.grba
>From: JASON W VESTER
>...
> Tolkien is the famed writer of such fantasy genre novels as ''The
> Adventures of Tom Bombadil,'' and ''The Silmarillon.'' A distinguished
> professor of English, Tolkien began writing ''Lord of the Rings'' in
> 1936, and the three volumes took more than 14 years to complete.
Ovo zvu~i kao da je Jason tako dobro uradio doma}i zadatak da misli
da je pisac jo{ uvek `iv.
film.28dzim,
-> #15, johnnya
<M> ARMAGDENON
<M> Gledati ako imate izmedu 5 i 12 godina.
"Za malu decu i odrasle Amerikance".
film.29dr.grba,
-> #27, vdjole>>> Adventures of Tom Bombadil,'' and ''The Silmarillon.'' A distinguished
>>> professor of English, Tolkien began writing ''Lord of the Rings'' in
>>> 1936, and the three volumes took more than 14 years to complete.
>>
>> Ovo zvu~i kao da je Jason tako dobro uradio doma}i zadatak da misli
>> da je pisac jo{ uvek `iv.
Ne razumem šta si hteo da kažeš. Navodi su tačni.
film.30vasic,
-> #27, vdjole>> From: JASON W VESTER
>> ...
> Ovo zvu~i kao da je Jason tako dobro uradio doma}i zadatak da misli
> da je pisac jo{ uvek `iv.
Nije ovo bio Jasonov domaći zadatak. On je samo lik sa MERP (Middle
Earth Role Playing) liste koji je preneo tekst odnekle drugde.
film.32ultra.boy,
Wavovi iz filma "BALKANSKI SPIJUN"
bspijun.arjfilm.33chill,
Ima li neko neki Episode Guide ili bilo šta slično za seriju
"3rd Rock From the Sun" (emituje se na BK nedeljom u 20:00)...
film.34ivkeb,
Ima li ko na zajam ili zna u kom klubu se moze iznajmiti film
Dune (Dina).
Hvala
film.35dragosh,
-> #34, ivkeb-> Ima li ko na zajam ili zna u kom klubu se moze iznajmiti film
-> Dune (Dina).
Eeee,imaš u Zlatnom Oskaru gledao sam ja pre jedno 5 godina :)
Ako ga još gaje.To ti je u Kursulinoj 38-kod Kalenić pijace ako
te ne mrzi da ideš tamo iz drugog dela grada.Reci cu ti moj broj ako treba.
film.36dbambi,
Malo da se raspričam o filmu " Spašavanje redova Rajana ".
Na početku - film nije za svakoga. Naprosto je previše realističan
a to konkretno znači da ćete videti otkinute ruke i noge, udarac
metka u telo, prosuta creva ili zabadanje noža u srce i to sve u
krupnim planovima. Scene ubijanja, bilo da je to ubijanje u borbi
ili hladnokrvno ubijanje zatvorenika su prikazane sa očiglednom
namerom da se napravi pravi prikaz rata. Sa druge strane, realističnot
j doprinela tome da ovaj film ina vrlo konzistentnu priču iliti
priču " koja drži vodu ". Čuo sam suprotstavljena mišljenja o tome
da li je rađen prema istinitom događaju, ali čak i da smatramo
kako nije, to ne umanjuje njegovo čvrsto oslanjanje na konkretne
istorijske i geografske činjenice. Slučaj braće Salivan (petorica
braće koja su zajedno poginula na jednom brodu američke mornarice)
koji se pominje u filmu je istinit, krvave borbe na Omaha sektoru
prilikom iskrcavanja u Normandiji su verno i istinito prikazane, svako
spominjanje imena gradova ili reka ima čvrsto uporište u stvarnim
dešavanjima. U stvaranju kompletnog utiska nije se zaboravljalo na
detalje. Bio sam nemalo (ali zato vrlo prijatno :)) iznenađen kada
se u sceni borbe na kraju filma pojavio pravi pravcati nemački tenk
tipa " Tigar ". Naravno da ne znam da li je u pitanju samo drvena
kopija, ali ako jeste onda je zaista fantastična. Ukoliko se radi
o pravom tenku, trud prducenata zaslužuje svaku pohvalu. Tih tenkova
je proizvedeno jako malo, a na prste se mogu izbrojati oni koji
su preživeli rat.
Osim toga, stekao sam (možda pogrešan) utisak kako ovo nije film
sa nekim enormnim budžetom. Nema specijalnih efekata, kompjuterskih
animacija i sličnih džidža-bidža koje su postale standardne u
Holivudu i bez kojih se skoro ne može zamisliti neki prestižni
reditelj kao što je Spilberg. Mislim da je ovaj film još jednom
potvrdio kako je dobra priča ipak najvažnija. Na ovom mestu bi se
mogla uputiti i jedna od retkih zamerki - poprilična količina
američke patetike, ali navikli smo već :))
Gluma dobra, posebno Tom Henks, a dopale su mi se i uloge dvojice
tipova (bigaje, ne pamtim im imena :)) iz dva takođe dobra filma.
Rajana je glumio isti lik koji je nosio glavnu rolu u filmu " Dobri
Vil Hanting ", a jednog od članova Milerovog (Tom Henks) tima tumači
nosilac glavne muške uloge u filmu " Lud za Ejmi ". Preporuka za
sva tri filma i glumca :)
Bambi
film.37dr.grba,
-> #36, dbambi>> namerom da se napravi pravi prikaz rata. Sa druge strane, realističnot
>> j doprinela tome da ovaj film ina vrlo konzistentnu priču iliti
>> priču " koja drži vodu ". Čuo sam suprotstavljena mišljenja o tome
>> da li je rađen prema istinitom događaju, ali čak i da smatramo
>> kako nije, to ne umanjuje njegovo čvrsto oslanjanje na konkretne
>> istorijske i geografske činjenice.
Ne znam da li je po istinitom događaju, ali Spilbergu je odato
priznanje što je, možda po prvi put ovako glasno, iskrcavanje na
Normandiju predstavljeno onako kako je stvarno izgledalo: totalan
metež i užasna klanica, a ne napuderisano herojstvo svakog vojnika.
>> detalje. Bio sam nemalo (ali zato vrlo prijatno :)) iznenađen kada
>> se u sceni borbe na kraju filma pojavio pravi pravcati nemački tenk
>> tipa " Tigar ". Naravno da ne znam da li je u pitanju samo drvena
Beše komentar i o ovome: prosto, Spilberg kao producent ima toliko
novca, a kao filmski stvaralac toliko kunsta da mu se može da dovodi
stvari do bukvalnog savršenstva, što i čini.
Spilberg vlada filmskim jezikom perfektno, i to me opčinjava.
Nisam gledao ovaj film, ali se setim one jedine tačkice u boji
u "Šindlerovoj listi". Možda samo zbog te scene, a možda što je
u vreme gledanja tog filma i moje dete bilo toliko kao dete u tom
kadru, ono što sam tada osetio mogu da opišem samo kao čisti bol.
Ne sećam se, možda sam i plakao.
film.38obren,
-> #36, dbambi> Malo da se raspričam o filmu " Spašavanje redova Rajana ".
>
> Na početku - film nije za svakoga. Naprosto je previše realističan
> a to konkretno znači da ćete videti otkinute ruke i noge, udarac
> metka u telo, prosuta creva ili zabadanje noža u srce i to sve u
> krupnim planovima. Scene ubijanja, bilo da je to ubijanje u borbi
> ili hladnokrvno ubijanje zatvorenika su prikazane sa očiglednom
> namerom da se napravi pravi prikaz rata.
Da, ko planira da odgleda film sa devojkom/ženom bolje neka odustane
od ove ideje. Više od dva i po sata surovog (realnog) prikaza rata nije
baš za svakoga.
Već nakon prve takve scene, kada se pri iskrcavanju otvara zaštitni oklop
na čamcu "kontejneru", i kada vojnici bivaju izmasakrirani teškim
mitraljezom, postaje jasno da je film poseban i da se treba spremiti na
obilje takvih prizora rata.
> Osim toga, stekao sam (možda pogrešan) utisak kako ovo nije film
> sa nekim enormnim budžetom. Nema specijalnih efekata, kompjuterskih
> animacija i sličnih džidža-bidža koje su postale standardne u
> Holivudu i bez kojih se skoro ne može zamisliti neki prestižni
> reditelj kao što je Spilberg.
Budžet nije enorman, slažem se, ali ne bih rekao ni da je "Dreamworks"
štedeo na finansijama. Potrošeno je onoliko sredstava koliko je bilo
potrebno da se realizuje zamišljeno. Samo iskrcavanje je možda moglo da
se pokrije sa još više statista, ali i ovako deluje vrlo, vrlo ubedljivo
i realno.
Što se tiče specijalnih efekata, ja i volim one specijalne efekte koji
služe funkciji filma, a ne da bi publika grickajući semenke uzviknula:
"Uau, kakva eksplozija!" i sl. Ako se setiš scene kada američki vojnik
ne uspeva da na vreme stavi "sticky bomb" na gusenice nemačkog tenka i
pri tome eksplodira kao u igrici "Duke nukem" ;) shvatićeš da specijalnih
efekata i te kako ima, ali su sjajno ukomponovani u realnost priče, tj.
nisu tendenciozni i nametljivi.
Posebno treba pohvaliti zvučne efekte. Ne znam da li se film još negde
daje, ali u "Akademiji 28" su surround zvučni efekti zaista "surround".
Recimo krupan kadar vojnika u rovu oko koga podrhtava kamenje jer nailazi
tenk, a pri tome se i vaša stolica bukvalno trese od zaglušujućeg brujanja.
Zatim zviždanje metaka pri čemu jasno čujete sa koje strane dolaze,
međusobna dovikivanja i zapomaganja vojnika sa svih strana (takođe 3D
prostorni zvuk). Ja sam u nekoliko navrata hvatao sebe kako mi klecaju
kolena od uzbuđenja, ne pamtim kada sam se poslednji put tako uživeo u
radnju na platnu!
Uglavnom, preporučujem svima da pogledaju ovaj film, ja ću ga svakako
gledati još jednom.
film.39legolas,
-> #37, dr.grba>>Ne znam da li je po istinitom dogadaju, ali Spilbergu je odato
>>priznanje sto je, mozda po prvi put ovako glasno, iskrcavanje na
>>Normandiju predstavljeno onako kako je stvarno izgledalo: totalan
>>metez i uzasna klanica, a ne napuderisano herojstvo svakog vojnika.
Ja znam da kad je film poceo sa scenam da su mi se ucinile nekako
poznate, pogotovu scena sa "trazenjem ruke" i prosutim crevima. A
onda sam se setio da sam to citao iz nekih biografija o danu D.
Film je SAVRSENO uradjen sa tacnom dozom svega sto treba.
Prvi deo traje tacno onoliko koliko treba: dok ne oguglate.
Onda ide smirivanje sa scenama trazenja.
Na kraju je izvrsno uradjena scena sa Tigrovima u kojoj se umire na
nacin ne previse "krvav".
Mislim, ipak, da je najjaca scena ona kada Nemac polako ubada noz
onom Jevreju. Kako ga gleda u oci govori mu da cuti i polako ubada
noz dok se Jevreju polako gasi zivot u ocima.
Samo zbog te scene treba mu dati bar 6 Oskara iako je taj Oskar
izgubio na vrednosti posle Titanika.
film.40petarg,
Quotes to inspire you...
o glumi i glumcima
JG
quotes1.arjfilm.41petarg,
Transkript filma Good Will Hunting
JG
goodwill.zipfilm.42plejboj,
Obavezno pogledati film Simon Birch !!!
film.43plejboj,
Molim sve koji poseduju neke od dole navedenih filmova
da mi se jave na mail, radi presnimavanja istih.
- E.T. Vanzemaljac
- Princ dolazi u Ameriku
- Oscar je kriv za sve
- Betoven 2
- Stoj ili ce moja mama da puca
- Twins
- Gunis
- Lov na zeleni dijamant 1 i 2
- Dan Mrmota
- Rudnici kralja Salomona
- Nevidim zlo, necujem zlo
- Autostoper
- Dvoboj
- Home Alone 1 i 2
- Die Hard 1 i 2
- Gremlins 1 i 2
- Povratak u buducnost 1, 2 i 3
- Blues Brothers
- Top Gun
- Kosa
- Lovac na jelene
- Ratnici podzemlja
- Terminator
- Komando
- Brusterovi milioni
- Krokodil Dendi 1 i 2
- Konan 1, 2 i 3
- Rain man
- Vrana 1 i 2
- Bele noci
- Gulag Gulag
- Vatrene ulice
- Vodeni svet
- Bejb
- Usijane glave 1 i 2
- Goli pistolj 1, 2 i 3
- Predator 1 i 2
- Flinstons
- Speed
- Bornov identitet
- Independance day
- Prety women
- Fenomen
- Otkacena plavusa
- Ljubav jedne vestice
- Ghoustbusters 1 i 2
- Ajkula 1 - 7
- Strava u ulici brestova 1 - 6
- Noc vestica 1 i 3
- Petak 13 1 - 7
- Rocky 1 - 5
- Rambo 1, 2 i 3
- Mad Max 1, 2 i 3
- Indiana Dzons 3
- Braveheart
- Star Wars 1, 2 i 3
- Beverly Hills Cop 1, 2 i 3
Placam odlicno za odlicne snimke.
Javite mi na mail koje imate i dogovoricemo se.
Pozdrav
film.44petarg,
Neko je trazio...
3rd Rock From the Sun
- episode guide
- star bios
- credits
JG
txt.zipfilm.45petarg,
Nekoliko slika glumaca iz 3rd Rock From the Sun
slike.zipfilm.46petarg,
Dick Solomon: 26 wavova iz 3rd Rock From the Sun
"Call me an idiot!"
"I see the mashed potatoe fumes have gone to your brain."
"Behold the glory that is me."
"I find you pompous, judgemental and completely
self-absorbed. Would you be my friend?"
"Guns don't kill people, physics kills people!"
"Well, it's no cake walk being the dashing patriarch, but I deal
with it."
"I had sex again."
"Ribbed for her pleasure, but I turned them inside-out."
"Keep running you vulgar slut!"
"Oh yeah, some people are bastards."
"Hi, I'm Dick Solomon. I'm tight with the money, but never with
the lovin'."
"There's nothing wrong with feeling good about yourself,
especially if you look like me."
"You want the truth?! Well I can't handle the truth!"
"My body is just the vehicle that carries my brain around, and
my brain deserves a smooth, luxurious ride."
"Hello. My name is Dick and I'm a fat loser."
"Hey baby, what's shaking?"
"That's Earth baby!"
"You're an evil genius!"
"I can't allow women to fight over me, not even if they're
wearing bikinis in a big tub of mud!"
"Just because I'm a nobody doesn't mean I'm not
somebody."
"No, I will never come to my senses."
"You tramp!"
"I'm not wearing any panties."
"It's like those sneaker ads say, 'Just do her.'"
"I have a magic foot!"
"Well, I am the High Commander."
dick.zipfilm.47petarg,
Sally Solomon : 8 wavova iz 3rd Rock From the Sun
"Shut up butt rash!"
"Will someone please shoot me in the eye?"
"No speeka de eengleesh."
"I'm gonna have to plant a patent leather pump right in your
ass."
"The only time a woman is allowed to get fat is when she's
pregnant, but she can't even enjoy it cause she's barfing all
the time and her boobs have turned into a restaurant."
"I could belch the alphabet and men with PHDs would be
asking me to tutor their kids."
"I know, he's my wittle bunny wabbit."
"I'm a big, angry virgin and I'm happy about it."
sally.zipfilm.48petarg,
Harry Solomon : 14 wavova iz 3rd Rock From the Sun
"Nooooooooo!"
"Are you coming on to me?"
"Bagels... Bagels! We don't need no stinking bagels!"
"This is odd."
"Who's you're daddy? Daddy loves you..."
"Well I don't mind reading, it's reading books that I hate."
"We're an interstellar squad of superior beings for godsakes!
Now quit your bitchin' and get out of the kitchen!"
"Thank you for calling the Big Giant Head. We didn't make
the Head, we make it Big and Giant."
"Oh, look at this. I bet they break the genetic code and realize
Scully's been implanted by the Smoking Guy."
"Harry Solomon, United States Ambassador to Portugal."
"Thank you sir, may I have another?"
Harry sits on a whoopee cushion and excuses himself.
"Prepare to be dazzled."
"Permission to speak, High Commander..."
harry.zipfilm.49petarg,
razni wavovi iz 3rd Rock From the Sun
Mary "You're a big, fat, bumbling, oblivious, pepe-wearing, mega
idiot!"
Tommy "You are a meat head!"
Nina "You can kiss my black behind."
John Cleese "You have the head of a cookie. I want to eat you."
Nina "You are some messed-up white people."
Officer Don "Hmmmm, X-Files. Never really got it."
Tommy "Death sent me an e-mail."
Nina "Oh, don't involve me in that freak show."
Mary "You better be nice to me if you want your stocking stuffed."
Tommy "Tonight is my chance to get into Bra-ville."
misc.zipfilm.50petarg,
I na kraju: uvodna tema.
JG
3rdtheme.mp3film.51dr.grba,
-> #46, petarg>> "I see the mashed potatoe fumes have gone to your brain."
>> ...
>> "Keep running you vulgar slut!"
>> ...
>> "You want the truth?! Well I can't handle the truth!"
E, sad... Ostaje dilema: koji od ovih WAVova staviti u Windows za
pojavu kritične greške? (:
film.52zla.,
-> #43, plejbojjer ti to otvaras video klub pa ti trebaju stare,dobre klasike?!:)
film.53plejboj,
-> #52, zla.
> jer ti to otvaras video klub pa ti trebaju stare,dobre
> klasike?!:)
Vec imam video klub nekih cetri ipo meseca, a sad su se klijenti
povampirili pa traze sve te stare filmove...
film.54chill,
sad se setih... jedan od mnogobrojnih bisera imbecilnog prevodjenja filmova...
---------------------------------------------------------
DIE HARD WITH THE VENGEANCE - Umri Muški Sa Osvetom
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
U originalu (otprilike):
>> Bruce: "Hejzuse..."
>> Samuel: "Što me zoveš Hejzus?!
>> Ne zovem se tako! Zar ti ja ličim na portorikanca?"
U prevodu (otprilike):
>> Bruce: "Isuse..."
>> Samuel: "Što me zoveš Isus?!
>> Ne zovem se tako! Zar ti ja ličim na portorikanca?"
film.55zeljkoj,
-> #54, chill> U originalu (otprilike):
>>> Bruce: "Hejzuse..."
>>> Samuel: "Što me zoveš Hejzus?!
>>> Ne zovem se tako! Zar ti ja ličim na portorikanca?"
>
> U prevodu (otprilike):
>>> Bruce: "Isuse..."
>>> Samuel: "Što me zoveš Isus?!
>>> Ne zovem se tako! Zar ti ja ličim na portorikanca?"
Pa? Jesus - španski izgovor 'Hesus' (sa naglaskom na 'u') = Isus (naš
izgovor). U južnoj Americi se svaki drugi tako zove...
film.56chill,
-> #55, zeljkoj
>> Jesus - španski izgovor 'Hesus' (sa naglaskom na 'u')
Ma, nema veze sa tim... Ovaj je u filmu reko skroz nešto deseto..."HeJZus"...
film.57zeljkoj,
-> #56, chill>>> Jesus - španski izgovor 'Hesus' (sa naglaskom na 'u')
>
> Ma, nema veze sa tim... Ovaj je u filmu reko skroz nešto
> deseto..."HeJZus"...
Pa američki izgovor reči 'Hesus' :)
film.58chill,
-> #57, zeljkoj%(
'oće to tako, 'oće...
film.59wlaad,
-> #57, zeljkojnemo dame zovesh pavle, nisam ja englez, bre
film.61jones,
Tarantino govori o muzici 70-ih iz Pulp fiction-a
70s.movfilm.62karakondzula,
-> #36, dbambi
+| krvave borbe na Omaha sektoru
+| prilikom iskrcavanja u Normandiji su verno i istinito prikazane,
Jel bio neki tekst u "istoriji" u vezi toga?
Ako nije, mogo bi...
+| Osim toga, stekao sam (mozda pogresan) utisak kako ovo nije film
+| sa nekim enormnim budzetom. Nema specijalnih efekata, kompjuterskih
Pogreshan utisak, definitivno. Specijalnih efekata (kako vizuelnih
tako i zvuchnih) ima pregrsht, samo nisu shljashteci ko u tipichnim
akcionim amerchkim filmovima...
+| reditelj kao sto je Spilberg. Mislim da je ovaj film jos jednom
+| potvrdio kako je dobra prica ipak najvaznija. Na ovom mestu bi se
Po meni, daleko bolji scenario ima Shindlerova lista, dok je ovaj
vishe skoncentrisan na atmosferu bojnog polja.
+| mogla uputiti i jedna od retkih zamerki - poprilicna kolicina
+| americke patetike, ali navikli smo vec :))
Bez toga Ameri ne mogu...
+| Vil Hanting ", a jednog od clanova Milerovog (Tom Henks) tima tumaci
+| nosilac glavne muske uloge u filmu " Lud za Ejmi ". Preporuka za
Uh...a koji je taj?
Jedini koji je meni lichio na dotichnog je onaj shto mu ime lichi na
Rajan, samo ima slovo B u sebi :)....onaj shto je ostao na kraju, pored
onog malog smotanog...al, ko shto rekoh, LICHI...nije on...
film.63karakondzula,
-> #37, dr.grba
+| Ne znam da li je po istinitom dogadaju, ali Spilbergu je odato
+| priznanje sto je, mozda po prvi put ovako glasno, iskrcavanje na
+| Normandiju predstavljeno onako kako je stvarno izgledalo: totalan
+| metez i uzasna klanica, a ne napuderisano herojstvo svakog vojnika.
Po nekima to je i najbolji deo filma...
film.64karakondzula,
-> #38, obren
+| Posebno treba pohvaliti zvucne efekte. Ne znam da li se film jos negde
+| daje, ali u "Akademiji 28" su surround zvucni efekti zaista "surround".
Da, potrudishe se oko zvuka, dok, naprimer, kad sam gledao
"Event Horizont" sve je nekako bilo neubedljivo...dijalozi na prednjim
zvuchnicima, tek pokoji efekat preleti sa leve na desnu stranu a kad
prolazi svemirski brod kroz kadar chuje se samo brujanje...
...ma ja bi to bolje uradio! :)
Ali u ovom filmu je interesanto, takodje, shto kamera, pri tom famoznom
iskrcavanju, nije statichna - trese se, zaranja pod vodu (tu je isto dobri
efekti) i tome slichno...kao da je snimao reporter na licu mesta.
film.65karakondzula,
-> #39, legolas
+| Mislim, ipak, da je najjaca scena ona kada Nemac polako ubada noz
+| onom Jevreju. Kako ga gleda u oci govori mu da cuti i polako ubada
+| noz dok se Jevreju polako gasi zivot u ocima.
Definitvno najjacha scena...
film.66dr.iivan,
Ko je pisao scenario za "Crna Mačka Beli Mačor"?
Film rulez, zajedno sa Srđanom Todorovićem :)
film.67gligo,
-> #66, dr.iivan> Ko je pisao scenario za "Crna Macka Beli Macor"?
Gordan Mihic.
film.68chill,
-> #66, dr.iivan
>> "Crna Mačka Beli Mačor"?
>>
>> Film rulez, zajedno sa Srđanom Todorovićem :)
Film je ljiga... Krdža samo-tako...
film.69dbambi,
-> #62, karakondzula=>
=> +| krvave borbe na Omaha sektoru
=> +| prilikom iskrcavanja u Normandiji su verno i istinito prikazane,
=>
=> Jel bio neki tekst u "istoriji" u vezi toga?
=> Ako nije, mogo bi...
Pa nije bio do sad, a malo mi je i teško da ga koncipiram. Naime,
normandijski desant je jedna od verovatno najkomplikovanijih
ratnih operacija ikad izvedenih. U njoj je učestvovalo stotine
hiljada ljudi, vozila, aviona, bilo je na desetine i stotine
različitih jedninica koje su se kretale po vrlo složenom planu.
Sad...prilično je teško jedan takav događaj spakovati u tekst
od par destina kilobajta , a da sve bude dovoljno lako i jednostavno
da privuče i zadrži pažnju prosečnog čitaoca. Čim krenem da nabrajam
nazive jedinica ili imena mesta oko kojih su se vodile borbe, stvar
postaje beznadežno zamršena i svakako ne vuče na dalje čitanje.
=> Uh...a koji je taj?
=> Jedini koji je meni lichio na dotichnog je onaj shto mu ime lichi na
=> Rajan, samo ima slovo B u sebi :)....onaj shto je ostao na kraju, pored
=> onog malog smotanog...al, ko shto rekoh, LICHI...nije on...
To je onaj što se stalno buni oko svrhe cele misije i što u jednom
trenutku preti napuštanjem jedinice.
Bambi
film.70dr.iivan,
-> #68, chill> >> "Crna Mačka Beli Mačor"?
> >> Film rulez, zajedno sa Srđanom Todorovićem :)
>
> Film je ljiga... Krdža samo-tako...
E, nemaš pojma :)
Sve zavisi šta si očekivao od filma... Film je super urađen, ali je
radnja možda mogla da bude malo bolja...
film.71qpele,
-> #66, dr.iivan> Ko je pisao scenario za "Crna Macka Beli Macor"?
>
> Film rulez, zajedno sa Srdanom Todorovicem :)
A tek sto je beli macor odigrao, za oskara :)
film.72karakondzula,
-> #69, dbambi
+| Pa nije bio do sad, a malo mi je i tesko da ga koncipiram. Naime,
Ok...mozda bi mogo samo neshto ukratko...cifra ljudi koji su
se iskrcali, kolko je izginulo, kakve su taktike i strategije
tu primenjivane i tome slichno...
+| To je onaj sto se stalno buni oko svrhe cele misije i sto u jednom
+| trenutku preti napustanjem jedinice.
Jeste, jeste...taj...naprezah, o, nevidjeno svoje sive celije da
ga povezem sa likom iz Chasing Amy, al ne ide...a nije ni toliko
bitno...
film.73qpele,
-> #62, karakondzula> Jel bio neki tekst u "istoriji" u vezi toga?
U vezi SA TIM
Pele gramaticar :)))
film.74qpele,
-> #70, dr.iivan> Sve zavisi sta si ocekivao od filma... Film je super uraden, ali je
> radnja mozda mogla da bude malo bolja...
Ja sam ocekivao cigane, cigane sam i video, so, zadovoljan sam filmom :)
film.76chill,
-> #70, dr.iivan
>> Sve zavisi šta si očekivao od filma... Film je super urađen, ali je
>> radnja možda mogla da bude malo bolja...
Pa, da je SVE strava uradjeno, to stoji... Ono, Kusta zna znanje...
Aliiii, radnja je dooooooooooosadna, predvidljiva, nezanimljiva... užas...
Ubedljivo najgori Kustin film...
film.77junior,
::Big Lebowski
Večeras sam ga gledao po drugi put, mnogo moćan film ;) Inače, oduševljava
interesantan prevod .. "dude" je preveden kao "baki" ;))
Definitivno jedini film koji može da ugrozi Spilberga u trci za Oskarom.
film.78dbambi,
-> #72, karakondzula=>
=> +| Pa nije bio do sad, a malo mi je i tesko da ga koncipiram. Naime,
=>
=> Ok...mozda bi mogo samo neshto ukratko...cifra ljudi koji su
=> se iskrcali, kolko je izginulo, kakve su taktike i strategije
=> tu primenjivane i tome slichno...
Ke da bidne, ali za sad imam nešto drugo u planu, konkretno rečeno
biće to priča o holokaustu.
=> +| To je onaj sto se stalno buni oko svrhe cele misije i sto u jednom
=> +| trenutku preti napustanjem jedinice.
=>
=> Jeste, jeste...taj...naprezah, o, nevidjeno svoje sive celije da
=> ga povezem sa likom iz Chasing Amy, al ne ide...a nije ni toliko
=> bitno...
Zaboravi :)
Bambi
film.79petarg,
TV-shy Brando will star in CBS movie
By MIKE McDANIEL, Houston Chronicle TV Editor Staff
Marlon Brando will make his television movie debut, starring in a CBS
project that will begin production shortly.
In "Behind the Mask", Brando , 74, plays the chief of a center for the
mentally and physically challenged. When he suffers a heart attack, he
is saved by a mentally disabled young man. They then form a father-son
bond.
Other cast members and the air date are not known. Tom McLoughlin
("The Third Twin", "The Haunting of Helen Walker" and many other TV
films) will direct.
Brando won an Emmy in 1979 for his portrayal of George Lincoln Rockwell
in the miniseries "Roots". He also has won two Oscars ("The
Godfather", "On the Waterfront") and was Oscar-nominated six other
times ("A Dry White Season", "Last Tango in Paris", "Sayonara", "Julius
Caesar", "Viva Zapata!" and "A Streetcar Named Desire").
He is notorious for being shy of television, although he made a
celebrated 1994 appearance on "Larry King Live" in which he bussed the
interviewer on the lips.
*****
Brando dons 'Mask' for TV
By Michael Fleming
MARLON BRANDO dons ``Mask'' for TV ... WELLES-spring of material ...
Not CHI about controversy
NEW YORK (Variety) - In his first TV foray since an Emmy-winning
appearance in the 1979 ABC mini ``Roots: The Next Generations,'' Marlon
Brando has signed to play the lead in ``Behind the Mask,'' a
heartwarming drama that becomes a centerpiece of CBS's effort to ramp
up its event programming.
The film was scripted by Paul Eric Myers, who wrote ``The Deliverance
of Elaine'' for the network and is currently adapting E.L. Doctorow's
``Ragtime'' as a four-hour CBS miniseries. Stanley M. Brooks and Barry
Morrow will produce and Tom McLoughlin will direct.
``Barry and I got the rights to the story five years ago, and two years
ago had a greenlight for CBS, but we held out for the right star,''
said Brooks.
He wrote Brando a letter and months later got a call and an invite to
his house, which led to a courtship of several months. ``Finally I got
faxed a deal memo, which was the most exciting moment of my career.''
In the based-on-fact story, Brando will play a social worker who runs a
facility for the mentally disabled. When he suffers a heart attack, he
is saved by a young man who lives at the facility, and the doctor tries
to help him fill the holes in his psyche.
The project was put together by Sunta Izzicupo, CBS' senior vice
president for movies and miniseries, and has been a priority project
for CBS Television CEO/president Leslie Moonves. Moonves once seemed
near a deal to get Brando to play the title role in the CBS miniseries
of Mario Puzo's ``The Last Don.'' Since Brando was in the classic film
of Puzo's ``The Godfather,'' the reteaming could have generated huge
ratings, but talks broke down when Brando demanded megabucks for taking
part in the project.
Brando is in a different mindset with ``Behind the Mask.'' Realizing he
has a finite number of acting opportunities, the man still considered
one of the greatest living actors wants to string together a few
memorable performances to cap an up and down career. Brando's deal was
made by CAA.
film.80kate,
Ima li neko program Autorskog festvala?
film.81fox.,
Molim vasa uvazena misljenja po pitanju citata iz filma Tamna je
noc:'' Oce nas ize jesi na nebesi
nek se visak oklembesi. ''
Posebno me interesuje vasa prva impresija povodom citata i aluzije,
odnosno aspcojacije za '' Visak oklembesi ''.
film.83chill,
Danas je poginuo američki režiser ALAN PAKULA,
autor filmova "Djavolji Advokat", "Nedokazana Krivica", "Sofijin Izbor", itd...
film.84plejboj,
Simon Birch
HIT !!
simon.jpgfilm.85zla.,
-> #83, chill"Djavolji Advokat" je jadan od retkoh filmova koji ima ODLICAN TEKST!
odlicne dijaloge,odlicne monologe....strava......
film.86chill,
PORODICA ADAMS... Dajte neki EPISODE GUIDE, FAQ i slično...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Isto važi i za Star Trek)
film.87glumica,
Wednesday, November 25, 1998 Published at 17:55 GMT
Bonham-Carter signs up for talking dirty
Helena Bonham-Carter has been signed to appear in the first film to be
made by Elton John's production company.
The Oscar-nominated actress will play Cora in the ú3 million comedy
Women Talking Dirty, based on the novel by Isla Dewar.
The story revolves around an unlikely friendship between single mum
Cora and career girl Ellen in Edinburgh.
The film's co-producer David Furnish said: "Cora is a very gregarious,
free-spirited, free-thinking woman, but she has an unfortunate habit
of getting herself into trouble and having to go back and make things
right.
"Ellen, by contrast, is very thoughtful, but a plodder who has
difficulty making up her mind."
He said the friendship between the two women was severely tested but
refused to give away any details.
"It's very funny, fresh and modern, and every woman that reads the
script really seems to identify with it," he added.
Sir Elton set up Rocket Films with Furnish who shot the revealing
documentary, Tantrums And Tiaras about him.
Polly Steele will co-produce the new feature and will be directed by
Coky Giedroyc who made Stella Does Tricks.
Sir Elton said: "I am absolutely thrilled to have Helena on board.
She is an actress of exceptional talent and will do a wonderful job
playing Cora."
Bonham-Carter was nominated for the Oscar for best actress for her
role in The Wings Of The Dove earlier this year but lost out to Helen
Hunt.
She has been working on Hollywood thriller Fight Club, in which she
plays Brad Pitt's drug addict lover - a part she calls her first
girlfriend role.
Women Talking Dirty starts shooting in Edinburgh in March next year.
film.88arsic,
Francuski Kulturni Centar u Beogradu
Klub Podvodnih Aktivnosti "Beograd", Beograd
Nacionalna Acocijacija Ronilackih Instruktora, Beograd
Ronilacki Savez Crne Gore, Podgorica
Organizuju:
Medjunarodni festival dokumentarnih filmova o podvodnom svetu
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
11.12.1998. u Beogradu i 12.12.1998. u Podgorici
Rec je o filmovima koji su ucestvovali na svetsom festivalu
podvodnog filma koji se odrzava u Antibu, Francuska.
U Beogradu projekcije ce se odrzati u Cinema Rex-u, Jevrejska 16 sa
pocetkom u 18 i 20 casova.
Molimo Vas da obavestite i povedete Vase prijatelje i poznanike
ljubitelje vode i ronjenja.
U 17 casova u istoj sali bice uprilicen susret sa Danijelom
Mersijeom predsednikom festivala u Antibu i CEDIP-a.
Ulaz slobodan.
Dovidjenja na projekciji
dodatne informacije na tel: 625-032 KPA"Beograd" ili 176-77-80 ARI
film.89kum.djole,
Pretpostavljam da su mnogi gledali film "ID" (dakle, ne "It"
no baš "I.D." .. a zanima me, može li iko da grebuje par najjačih
replika u vidu WAV ili MP3 (VHS kasetu nudim na zajam).
film.90stex,
Jel ste gledali danas na drugom kanalu film "Uzicka republika"? Film je
strava. Odusevio sam se. Mozda bi partizani na kraju i uspeli da zadrze Uzice
da je medju njima bio i Bata Zivoinovic. :)
Ma kakav Armagedon, Gozila, Titanik, to su kese naspram nasih partizanskih
filmova.
Stex
film.91gytar,
-> #90, stexJel ste gledali danas na drugom kanalu film "Uzicka republika"?
Film je
strava. Odusevio sam se. Mozda bi partizani na kraju i uspeli da
zadrze Uzice
da je medju njima bio i Bata Zivoinovic. :)
Ma kakav Armagedon, Gozila, Titanik, to su kese naspram nasih
partizanskih
filmova.>>>>
a ko je jedini preziveo? branko kockica :))))
(i tito naravno, ali on se ne racuna)...
gytar
film.92aladine,
-> #90, stexA preziveo je i "Ciko jel sav ovaj lebac tvoj" ,
Zarko Jokanovic. Jedan od vodja(sa znacima navoda) studentskih
demonstracija 91, a sad poslanik ND u Skupstini.
Eh od leba do preko leba i platice od 10.000 dinara.
Zivela Uzicka.... ma kajmak.
film.93stex,
-> #91, gytar>a ko je jedini preziveo? branko kockica :))))
Da on nije preziveo mi ne bi smo danas imali nasu omiljenu seriju kocka kocka
kockica :)
Inace Bata Zivotinja je poubijao toliko svaba da me ne bi cudilo da je on lik
u igri 3DWolf :))))
Stex
film.95chill,
Kakav trip... :)
U bioskopu Kozara istripovali foru:
Dok se prikazuje NOĆ VEŠTICA, tokom najnapetijih 15 minuta filma, unajmili tipa
da u kostimu Majkla Majersa šeta medju publikom sa ogromnim nožem u ruci...
Ono-kao, šunja se i prestravljuje ljude!... Malo-malo pa se čuje neka riba
kako vrisne na sav glas... :)
I taaaaaaakooooo... Bioskop je polako ali sigurno prerastao u cirkus...
film.96morkin,
-> #95, chill> Dok se prikazuje NOĆ VEŠTICA, tokom najnapetijih 15 minuta filma,
> unajmili tipa da u kostimu Majkla Majersa šeta medju publikom sa
> ogromnim nožem u ruci...
Super fora... Ima da vodim ženu, ali neću da joj kažem za to.
Pravi bioskop. Još se posle pravdam da nisam znao.
:>>>>>>
film.97chill,
JOE PESCI propevao, bolje reći prorepovao... :))
Vrti se neki njegov spot za pesmu WISE GUY... Zanimljivo... :)
film.98legolas,
-> #97, chill>>JOE PESCI propevao, bolje reci prorepovao... :))
>>Vrti se neki njegov spot za pesmu WISE GUY... Zanimljivo... :)
I ja bi i prorepovao i propevao da mi je riba Naomi Kempbel ;)
film.100corgan,
-> #98, legolasBash je faca od choveka
al je malo smeshan
iako je hteo da to bude ono kao ozbiljno...
Wisw guy...:)
film.101chill,
ŠON KONERI glumi negativca u rimejku starog Džems Bond filma
"Operacija Grom". Agenta 007 u ovom filmu igraće LAJAM NISON...
Istovremeno se snima i 'pravi' Džems Bond film sa PIRS BROSNANOM,
zvaće se "Svet Je Premali" ili "Svet Nije Dovoljan", ne sećam se tačno...
film.102gkosta,
Hitno
mi treba film B R A C A K A R A M A Z O V I
-------------------------------
(po istoimenom romanu F.M.Dostojevskog)
Ajde vidite po svojim video klubovima ili kako god...
Ima cascenje da padne za onoga ko nabavi film...! :)
Aj'...
film.103gdown,
-> #102, gkostaA shta je , ne volish da citash lektiru ????
:>>
film.104gkosta,
-> #103, gdown>>A shta je , ne volish da citash lektiru ????
Cuti, bre...
Iza ove poruke stoji jos ceta djaka koja vas moli da nadjete ovaj film,
inace... ;)))
Frka je, sta da se radi...
film.105gdown,
-> #104, gkosta>> Frka je , sta da se radi ?
Pa da se cita !!!!
:))
pozdrav!
film.106dzim,
-> #104, gkosta
> Iza ove poruke stoji jos ceta djaka koja vas moli da nadjete ovaj
> film, inace... ;)))
E, ima da ga chitate...:>
film.107chill,
7. May 1999... DEEP BLUE SEA (r: Renny Harlin)
7. May 1999... THE MUMMY (u: Brendan Fraser)
21. May 1999... STAR WARS Episode 1: THE PHANTOM MENACE (r: George Lucas)
4. Jun 1999... THE MUSE (u: Sharon Stone)
11. Jun 1999... THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR (u: Pierce Brosnan, Rene Russo)
11. Jun 1999... AUSTIN POWERS 2: THE SPY WHO SHAGGED ME (u: Mike Meyers)
18. Jun 1999... DISNEY'S TARZAN
25. Jun 1999... GUY GETS KID (u: Adam Sandler)
2. Jul 1999... WILD, WILD WEST (r: B. Sonnenfeld; u: K. Kline, W. Smith)
16. Jul 1999... EYES WIDE SHUT (r: S. Kubrick; u: T. Cruise, R. Šerbedžija)
16. Jul 1999... INSPECTOR GADGET: THE MOVIE (u: Matthew Broderick)
23. Jul 1999... BOWFINDER'S BIG THING (u: Steve Martin, Eddie Murphy)
23. Jul 1999... MUPPETS IN SPACE
13. Aug 1999... FREDDY vs. JASON
Summer 1999... THE BRAND NEW ADVENTURES OF LAUREL & HARDY: FOR LOVE OF MUMMY
Summer 1999... SUMMER OF SAM (r: Spike Lee)
Summer 1999... GLADIATOR (r: Ridley Scott)
Summer 1999... DOUBLE JEOPARDY (u: Tommy Lee Jones)
Summer 1999... RUNAWAY BRIDE (u: Julia Roberts, Richard Gere)
Summer 1999... THE GENERAL'S DAUGHTER (u: John Travolta)
Summer 1999... DOGMA (r: Kevin Smith; u: Alanis Morissette)
Approved sequels: CARRIE 2
DUMB AND DUMBER 2
GHOSTBUSTERS 3
MAD MAX 4
PINK PANTHER 9
RAMBO 4
RUSH HOUR 2
TOTALL RECALL 2
UNIVERSAL SOLDIER 2
Not yet approved: BAD BOYS 2
BASIC INSTINCT 2
BATMAN 5
DIE HARD 4
THE BIRDCAGE 2
THE FLINTSTONES 2
INDIANA JONES 4
JUMANJI 2
TRUE LIES 2
TWISTER 2
THE MASK 2
MEN IN BLACK 2